Andrew Sullivan: “A Conservative for Obama?”
Good Readin', Party Politics, War for the White House Tagged andrew sullivan, barack obama May 27th, 2008In the group I run with, Obama isn’t exactly getting glowing endorsements. There are the oh-so-witty quips—”Now that’s a change we can believe in,” referring to anything (and therefore nothing of substance)—and the disparaging comments and the snorts of disapproval. Fundamentalist libertarians and conservatives seem to have trouble understanding why one might consider a “tax-and-spend Democrat”…as if that’s any better than a spend-and-spend-and-spend Republican.
Anyway, I read an interesting post today by Andrew Sullivan, narrating why he (a conservative) wants Obama to win. Here’s an excerpt:
I haven’t sat through a single Obama speech without ideologically wincing at something. I fear that in the general election, his recourse to liberal tropes will begin to wear thin.
So why do I find myself still longing for him to win?
Because, I can’t see how domestic policy could become more statist and less responsible than the past eight years. Because I want to see such a record punished with electoral defeat for fear they still don’t know what they did wrong. Because I think Obama’s diplomatic skills and public relations brilliance could serve this country very well. And because of what Obama represents in our collective consciousness.
His candidacy is about renewing what America means to the world and to itself. It is about a collective cultural healing—especially on race. It is about representing the next generation and America’s less domineering but more inspiring place among nations. It is about transparency in government. It is about getting past this brutal cultural polarization for a while. It is about putting reason back into our discourse after the emotional manipulation of the Morris-Rove era. It is about ending torture, restoring Constitutional balance, and adding the power of words, of great words, to restore hope again.
Read Sullivan’s whole piece here. And, as always, I’d love to hear your thoughts.




May 27th, 2008 at 3:40 pm
[...] Continue Reading [...]
May 27th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Is Andrew talking about the same Barack Obama running against Hillary now? It seems he must be talking about someone else because Barack won’t bring back Constitutional balance. The hope he may bring will be short lived once he starts implementing his socialist policies.
May 28th, 2008 at 8:19 am
Constitutional balance has little to do with socialist economic policy. It refers to the balance between the 3 branches of government (even according to Ron Paul, http://www.antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=11272), which has been supremely screwed up in the last 8 year. In terms of the balance between branches, Obama is by far the best between himself, Clinton, and McCain.
May 28th, 2008 at 8:53 am
Well said.
Additionally, one of the biggest points that struck home for me was this: “Because, I can’t see how domestic policy could become more statist and less responsible than the past eight years. Because I want to see such a record punished with electoral defeat for fear they still don’t know what they did wrong.”
No one is disputing that Obama is a liberal through and through. It’s in spite of that–and because of the reasons explained so eloquently by Sullivan–that he could be a candidate worth considering. Republicans deserve to lose…badly. My hope is that a spectacular defeat will be a first step toward major overhaul within the party.
May 28th, 2008 at 8:54 am
Well, I personally like Obama as well. Not for the policies, or views, but he is the ONLY one who is somewhat offering hope. McCain sounds bitter. Hillary sounds, will like Hillary Clinton. The public is so divided, and people are having a real hard time, so if someone sounds hopeful, that would be like a mirage. I think that he has some socialist attributes, but he is encouraging a dialogue. Is McCain?
May 29th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
We cannot say that Obama will be this much or that much better than others when it comes to the balance of power–we just don’t know. He says–like any politician–what he believes people want to hear.
Republicans deserve to lose, don’t get me wrong, but I fear that an Obama administration would be Carter, term II. Will that be best for us in the medium and long-terms? Perhaps, but I’ll excuse myself from affirming the policy boondoggle-to-be.